ESTUDO DE AULA COMO FACILITADOR DE APRENDIZAGENS DE FUTUROS PROFESSORES DE FÍSICA E QUÍMICA SOBRE O USO DE MÚLTIPLAS
Resumo
Este estudo teve como objetivo compreender como é que três futuros professores usaram as múltiplas representações (MR) no ensino da energia cinética de um corpo num estudo de aula. Nesta investigação optou-se por seguir uma metodologia de investigação qualitativa com orientação interpretativa. Os dados foram recolhidos através de observação participante (registo vídeo e diário de bordo), entrevistas individuais e reflexões individuais. O estudo de aula foi realizado numa unidade curricular do curso de mestrado dos futuros professores, tendo envolvido 17 sessões. Os resultados mostraram que os futuros professores aprenderam a usar as três funções das MR de Ainsworth (2008) no ensino da energia cinética, nas diversas fases do estudo de aula. Ou seja, aprenderam a usar a complementaridade das MR, a usar as MR para estimular a interpretação de outras e a usar as MR para a compreensão mais aprofundada dos conceitos.
Referências
Ainsworth, S. (2006). DeFT: A conceptual framework for considering learning with multiple representations. Learning and Instruction, 16, 183-198.
Ainsworth, S. (2008). The educational value of multiple-representations when learning complex scientific concepts. In J. K. Gilbert, M. Reiner, & M. Nakhleh (Eds.), Visualization: Theory and practice in science education (pp. 191–208). NewYork, NY: Springer.
Ainsworth, S. (2014). The multiple representations principle in multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2nd ed., pp. 464–486). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chittleborough, G., & Treagust, D. (2008). Correct interpretation of chemical diagrams requires transforming from one level of representation to another. Research in Science Education, 38(4), 463–482.
Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M. C. Wittroch (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching. New York, NY: Macmillan.
Fernandez, C., Cannon, J., & Chokshi, S. (2003). A US–Japan lesson study collaboration reveals critical lenses for examining practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19(2), 171-185.
Fujii, T. (2016). Designing and adapting tasks in lesson planning: a critical process of Lesson Study. ZDM Mathematics Education 48(4), 411-423. doi 10.1007/s11858-016-0770-3
Chichibu, T. (2016) Impact on lesson study for initial teacher training in Japan: Focus on mentor roles and kyouzai-kenkyuu. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 5(2), 155-168. doi.org/10.1108/IJLLS-01-2016-0001.
Gilbert, J. K. (2005). Visualization: A metacognitive skill in science and science education. In J. K. Gilbert (Ed.), Visualization in science education. Dordrecht: Springer.
Lewis, C. C. (2008). Lesson study. In L. B. Easton (Ed.), Powerful designs for professional learning (2nd ed.), (pp. 171–184). Oxford, OH: National Staff Development Council.
Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Murata, A. (2011). Introduction: conceptual overview of lesson study. In L.C. Hart, A.S. Alston, & A. Murata (Eds), Lesson Study Research and Practice in Mathematics Education, (pp. 13-24). New York, NY: Springer.
Nieminen, P., Savinainen, A., & Viiri, J. (2017). Learning about forces using multiple representations. In D. F. Treagust, R. Duit, & H. E. Fischer (Eds.), Multiple Representations in Physics Education, Models and Modeling in Science Education (pp. 160-178). Switzerland: Springer.
Park, B., Flowerday, T., & Brünken, R. (2015). Cognitive and affective effects of seductive details in multimedia learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 44, 267-278.
Stigler, J.W., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap. New York, NY: The Free Press.
Sykes, G., Bird, T., & Kennedy, M. (2010). Teacher education: Its problems and some prospects. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(5), 464-476.
Takahashi, A., & McDougal, T. (2016). Collaborative lesson research: maximizing the impact of lesson study. ZDM Mathematics Education 48(4), 513-526. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-015-0752-x
Tsui, C., & Treagust, D. F. (2013). Introduction to multiple representations: Their importance in biology and biological education. In D. Treagust & C. Tsui (Eds.), Multiple representations in biological education (pp. 3-18). Dordrecht: Spinger.
Tytler, R., Prain, V., & Peterson, S. (2007). Representational issues in students’ learning about evaporation. Research in Science Education, 37(3), 313–331.
Won, M., Yoon, H., & Treagust, D. F. (2014). Students' learning strategies with multiple representations: Explanations of the human breathing mechanism. Science Education, 98, 840–866. doi.org/10.1002/sce.21128
Zhou, G., Xu, J., & Martinovic, D. (2016). Developing pre-teaching science with technology through microteaching lesson study approach. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 13(1), 85-103. doi 10.12973/eurasia.2017.00605a.
